Casino Royale
I was granted the privilege, earlier today, of seeing the newest Bond movie that has been released entitled "Casino Royale". I must say, Daniel Craig's role of playing James Bond did not go un-fulfilled; in fact, I may even say that I place him equal-to or above Sean Connery.
This movie was particularly thrilling, with the fact that Christian noted that Vesper Lynd (played by Eva Green) had boobies and also with all the action. However, instead of noting all the good aspects of the movie, which most critics don't do, ill follow along and note my complaints.
1) No Satellites or lasers: what the hell? How can you call a movie a James Bond movie if it doesn't have massive satellites or fucking lasers?
2) Not many Death-by-Railings: How can you call yourself an action movie with only two death-by-railings? I mean come on, Army of Darkness had seven in one scene, ONE SCENE.
3) Plot was meh: Not really any plot, really it was basically James has been promoted to a double agent and is learning the fact that he can trust no one and how easy it is to be double-crossed and double-crossed again.
However, setting aside these minor (except numbers 1 and 2) complaints, I must say this movie was superb. It defiantly ranks up there in the echelon of greatest bond movies ever. Of course, this is just my opinion and I'm sure most of you value my opinion (note the sarcasm). But none-the-less, I highly suggest paying the $8.25 to see this movie because I give it four and five-sevenths stars out of five. (Sorry, but the lack of satellites and lasers. . . )
This movie was particularly thrilling, with the fact that Christian noted that Vesper Lynd (played by Eva Green) had boobies and also with all the action. However, instead of noting all the good aspects of the movie, which most critics don't do, ill follow along and note my complaints.
1) No Satellites or lasers: what the hell? How can you call a movie a James Bond movie if it doesn't have massive satellites or fucking lasers?
2) Not many Death-by-Railings: How can you call yourself an action movie with only two death-by-railings? I mean come on, Army of Darkness had seven in one scene, ONE SCENE.
3) Plot was meh: Not really any plot, really it was basically James has been promoted to a double agent and is learning the fact that he can trust no one and how easy it is to be double-crossed and double-crossed again.
However, setting aside these minor (except numbers 1 and 2) complaints, I must say this movie was superb. It defiantly ranks up there in the echelon of greatest bond movies ever. Of course, this is just my opinion and I'm sure most of you value my opinion (note the sarcasm). But none-the-less, I highly suggest paying the $8.25 to see this movie because I give it four and five-sevenths stars out of five. (Sorry, but the lack of satellites and lasers. . . )
posted by Anarch1st at 11:47 PM
2 Comments:
lol boobies!
Ok, here's what you need to know:
1)Boobies
2)No satellites that fire world-destroying lasers
Um, I'm not really sure what you mean by a mediocre plot. It actually had character development n' shit, something the oh, say, past ten Bond movies lacked?
And Sean Connery wasn't that good as Bond. For proof, see: any Sean Connery movie that is not James Bond.
Post a Comment
<< Home